Skip to content
Advertisement

Redux createAsyncThunk vs useEffect hook

I’m familiar with react hooks, and i find it really easy to work with useEffect, thunk is very difficult to deal with, can i just use useEffect & axios and just dispatch the result to the store without using createAsyncThunk? is there any major performance benefit to use it over useEffect?

createAsyncThunk:

import { createAsyncThunk, createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit'
import { userAPI } from './userAPI'

// First, create the thunk
const fetchUserById = createAsyncThunk(
  'users/fetchByIdStatus',
  async (userId, thunkAPI) => {
    const response = await userAPI.fetchById(userId)
    return response.data
  }
)

// Then, handle actions in your reducers:
const usersSlice = createSlice({
  name: 'users',
  initialState: { entities: [], loading: 'idle' },
  reducers: {
    // standard reducer logic, with auto-generated action types per reducer
  },
  extraReducers: {
    // Add reducers for additional action types here, and handle loading state as needed
    [fetchUserById.fulfilled]: (state, action) => {
      // Add user to the state array
      state.entities.push(action.payload)
    }
  }
})

// Later, dispatch the thunk as needed in the app
dispatch(fetchUserById(123))

useEffect:

import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import { useDispatch } from 'react-redux'
import { userAPI } from './userAPI'
import axios from 'axios';
 
function App() {  
const dispatch = useDispatch()
useEffect(() => {
axios
  .get(userAPI)
  .then(response => dispatch({type:'fetchUsers',payload:response.data}));
    }, []);

Advertisement

Answer

The two setups are essentially similar. You can do the same thing with both approaches.

With the codes exactly as you have them written here, there is a major advantage to the createAsyncThunk approach because it will catch any errors that occur in the API call. It will respond to those errors by dispatching a fetchUserById.rejected action instead of a fetchUserById.fulfilled action. Your reducer doesn’t responded to the rejected case which is fine. The error is still caught. With your useEffect you run the risk of “uncaught error in Promise” errors.

Now of course you can catch the errors on your own. You can also dispatch a pending action at the start of the effect. But once you start doing that, the createAsyncThunk might feel a lot easier by comparison since it automatically dispatches pending, fulfilled, and rejected actions.

useEffect(() => {
  dispatch({ type: "fetchUsers/pending" });
  axios
    .get(userAPI)
    .then((response) =>
      dispatch({ type: "fetchUsers", payload: response.data })
    )
    .catch((error) =>
      dispatch({ type: "fetchUsers/rejected", payload: error.message })
    );
}, []);
User contributions licensed under: CC BY-SA
8 People found this is helpful
Advertisement