A stupid simple canvas usage:
var canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
ctx.strokeStyle = "#CCCC00";
ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.strokeRect(0, 0, width, height);
Yields a rectangle with narrower lines along top and left:
Why does this happen? Do I need to offset with padding? It’s annoying.
Advertisement
Answer
2 things.
First, odd lineWidths (1, 3, 5, …) will never apply cleanly with drawn on integer pixel values. This is because X and Y refer to the space between pixels rather than their centers. So a stroke of 1 that runs from [1,1] to [1,10] spills half into the pixel on the left column of pixels and half into right. If you instead draw that line from [1.5,1] to [1.5,10] then it fills half to the left, and half to the right, filling up the whole pixel column perfectly.
Any odd number width will show this behavior, but even numbers will not because they fill a full pixel on each side looking clean.
Second, the box is obscured by the top of the canvas. When you center your 3px stroke on [0,0] it spills as far up and left as [-1.5,-1.5] which is outside of the visible range of the canvas. So it appears half as thick as it should be.
See the proof of difference here:
var canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
// original box, eclipsed by canvas bounds
ctx.strokeStyle = "#CC0000";
ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.strokeRect(0, 0, 20, 20);
// moved from canvas bounds
ctx.strokeStyle = "#CC0000";
ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.strokeRect(25, 25, 20, 20);
// drawn on half pixel coordinated to precent blurry lines with odd integer line widths.
ctx.strokeStyle = "#CC0000";
ctx.lineWidth = 3;
ctx.strokeRect(50.5, 50.5, 20, 20);body { margin: 10px }<canvas id="canvas" width="100" height="100"></canvas>
Which should render this:
The first one is like your code. The second is moved away from the top left edge to show its uniform in width. And the third shows how to render a 3px stroke without subpixel blurring.