After putting off testing for a while now due to Cypress not allowing visiting chrome://
urls, I decided to finally understand how to unit/integration test my extension – TabMerger. This comes after the many times that I had to manually test the ever growing functionality and in some cases forgot to check a thing or two. Having automated testing will certainly speed up the process and help me be more at peace when adding new functionality.
To do this, I chose Jest since my extension was made with React (CRA). I also used React Testing Library (@testing-library/react
) to render all React components for testing.
As I recently made TabMerger open source, the full testing script can be found here
Here is the test case that I want to focus on for this question:
import React from "react"; import { render, fireEvent } from "@testing-library/react"; import * as TabFunc from "../src/Tab/Tab_functions"; import Tab from "../src/Tab/Tab"; var init_groups = { "group-0": { color: "#d6ffe0", created: "11/12/2020 @ 22:13:24", tabs: [ { title: "Stack Overflow - Where Developers Learn, Share, & Build Careersaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa", url: "https://stackoverflow.com/", }, { title: "lichess.org • Free Online Chess", url: "https://lichess.org/", }, { title: "Chess.com - Play Chess Online - Free Games", url: "https://www.chess.com/", }, ], title: "Chess", }, "group-1": { color: "#c7eeff", created: "11/12/2020 @ 22:15:11", tabs: [ { title: "Twitch", url: "https://www.twitch.tv/", }, { title: "reddit: the front page of the internet", url: "https://www.reddit.com/", }, ], title: "Social", }, }; describe("removeTab", () => { it("correctly adjusts groups and counts when a tab is removed", () => { var tabs = init_groups["group-0"].tabs; const { container } = render(<Tab init_tabs={tabs} />); expect(container.getElementsByClassName("draggable").length).toEqual(3); var removeTabSpy = jest.spyOn(TabFunc, "removeTab"); fireEvent.click(container.querySelector(".close-tab")); expect(removeTabSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); expect(container.getElementsByClassName("draggable").length).toEqual(2); // fails (does not remove the tab for some reason) }); });
I mocked the Chrome API according to my needs, but feel that something is missing. To mock the Chrome API I followed this post (along with many others, even for other test runners like Jasmine): testing chrome.storage.local.set with jest.
Even though the Chrome storage API is mocked, I think the issue lies in this function which gets called upon initial render. That is, I think the chrome.storage.local.get
is not actually being executed, but am not sure why.
// ./src/Tab/Tab_functions.js /** * Sets the initial tabs based on Chrome's local storage upon initial render. * If Chrome's local storage is empty, this is set to an empty array. * @param {function} setTabs For re-rendering the group's tabs * @param {string} id Used to get the correct group tabs */ export function setInitTabs(setTabs, id) { chrome.storage.local.get("groups", (local) => { var groups = local.groups; setTabs((groups && groups[id] && groups[id].tabs) || []); }); }
The reason I think the mocked Chrome storage API is not working properly is because when I manually set it in my tests, the number of tabs does not increase from 0. Which forced me to pass a prop (props.init_tabs
) to my Tab
component for testing purposes (https://github.com/lbragile/TabMerger/blob/f78a2694786d11e8270454521f92e679d182b577/src/Tab/Tab.js#L33-L35) – something I want to avoid if possible via setting local storage.
Can someone point me in the right direction? I would like to avoid using libraries like jest-chrome
since they abstract too much and make it harder for me to understand what is going on in my tests.
Advertisement
Answer
I think I have a solution for this now, so I will share with others.
I made proper mocks for my chrome storage API to use localStorage:
// __mocks__/chromeMock.js ... storage: { local: { ..., get: function (key, cb) { const item = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem(key)); cb({ [key]: item }); }, ..., set: function (obj, cb) { const key = Object.keys(obj)[0]; localStorage.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(obj[key])); cb(); }, }, ... }, ...
Also, to simulate the tab settings on initial render, I have a beforeEach
hook which sets my localStorage
using the above mock:
// __tests__/Tab.spec.js var init_ls_entry, init_tabs, mockSet; beforeEach(() => { chrome.storage.local.set({ groups: init_groups }, () => {}); init_ls_entry = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("groups")); init_tabs = init_ls_entry["group-0"].tabs; mockSet = jest.fn(); // mock for setState hooks });
AND most importantly, when I render(<Tab/>)
, I noticed that I wasn’t supplying the id
prop which caused nothing to render (in terms of tabs from localStorage
), so now I have this:
// __tests__/Tab.spec.js describe("removeTab", () => { it("correctly adjusts storage when a tab is removed", async () => { const { container } = render( <Tab id="group-0" setTabTotal={mockSet} setGroups={mockSet} /> ); var removeTabSpy = jest.spyOn(TabFunc, "removeTab"); var chromeSetSpy = jest.spyOn(chrome.storage.local, "set"); fireEvent.click(container.querySelector(".close-tab")); await waitFor(() => { expect(chromeSetSpy).toHaveBeenCalled(); }); chrome.storage.local.get("groups", (local) => { expect(init_tabs.length).toEqual(3); expect(local.groups["group-0"].tabs.length).toEqual(2); expect(removeTabSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); }); expect.assertions(4); }); });
Which passes!!
Now on to drag and drop testing 😊